Article of Choice #2: “From spreading to embedding innovation in healthcare: Implications for theory and practice”

Article of Choice #2: “From spreading to embedding innovation in healthcare: Implications for theory and practice”

Article of Choice #2: “From spreading to embedding innovation in healthcare: Implications for theory and practice”

From spreading to embedding innovation in healthcare: Implications for theory and practice is an original article published by Health Care Management Review – a peer-reviewed academic journal. Articles in this journal “ translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty“ (Journals). The article is dated 2021, and the authors working on it are Harry Scarbrough and Yiannis Kyratsis. Harry Scarbrough is a PhD, Professor of Information Systems and Management and Co-Director with education and experience from the Centre for Healthcare Innovation Research, Bayes Business School, City, University of London, United Kingdom. Yiannis Kyratsis is a PhD Associate Professor in Organization Theory and Head of the Organization Theory Group, VU Amsterdam, the Netherlands. It is stated that both authors contributed equally to this article.

1 hour!

The minimum time our certified writers need to delivera 100% original paper

LEARN MORE

Evaluating the Source

According to Resurchify (2021) Health Care Management Review is a journal covering the technologies/fields/categories related to health policy leadership and management and strategy and management. It is published by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd. Health Care Management Review is cited by a total of 266 articles during the last 3 years (Resurchify, 2020).

Evaluating the Tone: From spreading to embedding innovation in healthcare

The authors’ tone is balanced and objective since no value judgments are provided, and the language is scientific and precise. All the arguments are well developed and well supported, with more than 40 sources included in the bibliography and all used to support claims made by the authors. The authors put forward the idea that, rather than studying the spread of innovations through diffusion across organizations or implementation within organizations, it makes sense to refocus it toward embedding innovation – that is, the issue of the implementation of innovations at scale.

Evaluating the Content

The abstract states the issue of the study, then proposes a critical theoretical analysis, then gives insight and suggests practical implications after that. The purpose of the study is clear, and the methods are appropriate for the purpose. The article is coherent in that there is a connectedness in the way it is structured. Furthermore, the introduction clearly states the purpose of the paper and explains why previous studies of the spread of innovation in healthcare have not taken into consideration the factors that are necessary to consider. An overview of the other studies’ conclusions that support the authors’ claims is given, and a clear roadmap of the rest of the paper is provided. While there is no literature review in the article, it is to be noted that 44 sources are employed. There are numerous references to previous studies and the results they have come to in terms of their applicability to this paper. All the reviewed articles are credible, relevant and current.

The methodology includes focusing on the theory first: three mechanisms connecting the experience of the local implementation of innovations to their global diffusion within a healthcare system are outlined. Those are learning, adapting and institutionalizing, and each is expanded upon. The practical approach includes identifying self-limiting tensions within existing approaches and outlining new ones. The research outcomes clearly address the problem and propose an approach titled embedding innovation. That is to enable the experience of implementation deeply and extensively. Enough detail is provided for the reader to independently check the results. In the discussion, the research question and objectives have been clearly addressed and have been related to the sources used. Furthermore, The limitations of the study have been considered while developing the original approach to the issue, and the theoretical and practical implications have been clearly developed. The article is coherent in its structure and consistency.

References

Health Care Management Review: About the journal. Journals. (n.d.).

Health Care Management review- impact factor, overall ranking, h-index, SJR, rating, publisher, ISSN, and other important metrics. Resurchify. (2021).