Assignment: Clinical Evaluation Tool

Assignment: Clinical Evaluation Tool

Assignment: Clinical Evaluation Tool

The report must be in APA format and between 800 and 1,000 words long. The assignment must receive 76 percent on the grading rubric and meet the requirements of the Clinical Evaluation Tool’s specific criteria. The report must include personal reflection and a brief summary of what was learned during the community experience, as well as the criteria on the Community Experience Rubric. Include discussions of how the nurse can serve as a positive role model as well as the nursing process in the community setting.

Types of Clinical Evaluation Tools

Determination of progression within the nursing curriculum and achieving good competency requires the designation of clinical evaluation tools. Such tools are purposely designed to evaluate the nursing programs’ skills, attitudes, and knowledge to obtain clinical benefits programs related to professionalism and nursing standards (Unger et al., 2019). Such include; clinical trials, clinical reviews, and program trials. The clinical reviews entail an assessment of the indispensable and the result concerning care provided.

Additionally, clinical reviews are performed by clinicians who sometimes need help to do it impartially. Therefore, if the judgment of the clinician is to stop treatment, there is a need for further assessment. When the need for the same treatment continues, consideration of effectiveness and unsolicited impacts is done (Unger et al., 2019). Besides, clinical trials are concerned with the efficacy that cuts across patients with various attitudes and characteristics.

Explanation concerning the unsatisfactory or satisfactory of the service relies on the efficiency of the service in this case. Therefore, clinical trials are designed to provide accuracy and prevention of bias. Notably, program trials consider changes realized in health status and characteristics as a criterion to realize the effectiveness of this tool. Besides, program trials clinical evaluation tool is the chance of association between care and results. Attention is needed to achieve accuracy, and the criterion for accuracy is linked to the relationship between cause-and-effect factors.

The Pros and Cons of Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are essential in helping patients acquire treatment for the illness before the new treatment becomes available to other people (Ma et al., 2020). Clinical trials are beneficial since patients can play roles in their health care. However, clinical trials may be less effective than expected. Again, patients may encounter side effects from the trials.

The Pros and Cons of Clinical Reviews

The benefit of clinical reviews is that they subsequently determine any possible errors or gaps that may be involved in the medical care provided—resulting in improvement in forthcoming medical practice (Ma et al., 2020). However, using clinical reviews can be challenging in determining if the effects of treatment are a result of the kind of treatment provided to the patient unless it is particularly shown to have resulted from a dose -effect.

The Pros and Cons of Program Trials

Program trials help obtain new treatment methods before they become accessible to many people. However, this model may need to be revised if the objectives cover the part of valuable results of the measurement.

References

Ma, L. L., Wang, Y. Y., Yang, Z. H., Huang, D., Weng, H., & Zeng, X. T. (2020). Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they, and which is better? Military Medical Research, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00238-8

Unger, J. M., Vaidya, R., Hershman, D. L., Minasian, L. M., & Fleury, M. E. (2019). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Magnitude of Structural, Clinical, and Physician and Patient Barriers to Cancer Clinical Trial Participation. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 111(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djy22