Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points NUR-550 NUR-550-O503 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Research Design Comparison 100.0

 

 

Revision (Nursing Practice) 10.0 percent In either case, the issue with nursing practice was not addressed. For an evidence-based practice project proposal, the revisions did not meet the applicable nursing practice problem requirements. There are still changes that need to be made before the final version can be approved. The proposed nursing practice problem has undergone a number of revisions in an attempt to make it more accurate and precise. Additional modifications are still needed for approval. NA There has been a clear presentation of the issue with nursing practice and it has been approved. All necessary adjustments were made, or no revisions were necessary.

Articles on Translation and Tradition 15.0 percent of Choosing more than two articles does not fulfill the assignment’s requirements. There is at least one omission. Two of the submitted articles fail to meet the requirements of the assignment. One or two articles do not support the claimed nursing practice problem, and it is not obvious why. The assignment conditions are not met by one article. This issue is supported by a majority of literature in this field. With the help of one or two other articles, the stated problem would be better supported. Each article has been evaluated to ensure that it meets the assignment’s requirements and provides enough evidence to support the theory behind the problem. Comparative studies were conducted using quantitative and qualitative research articles. Published during the previous five years, these peer-reviewed articles address a current issue in nursing practice. All of the requirements for this assignment have been met.

Comparison of Methodology Between Translational and Traditional Research 15.0% The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is omitted. The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A summary comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear. The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity. The comparison between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative methodologies is thorough and accurate. A clear understanding of translational and traditional methodologies is demonstrated.

Comparison of Goals Between Translational and Traditional Research 15.0% The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is omitted. The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A summary comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear. A comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity. The comparison of goals between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is thorough and accurate. An understanding of goals between traditional and translational research is evident.

Comparison of Data Collection Between Translational and Traditional Research 15.0% The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is omitted. The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A summary comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is presented. Some aspects are incorrect or unclear. The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is adequately presented. Some aspects require more detail for accuracy or clarity. The comparison of data collection between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research is thorough and accurate. An understanding of goals between traditional and translational research is evident.

Observations (Similarities and Differences) 20.0% The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are not discussed. The similarities and differences between translational and quantitative and translational and qualitative research are only partially discussed. The narrative is vague and contains inaccuracies. The similarities and differences between transla

Our Advantages

Quality Work

Unlimited Revisions

Affordable Pricing

24/7 Support

Fast Delivery

Order Now

Custom Written Papers at a bargain