When determining the credibility of different types of sources, including academic articles and websites, it is necessary to focus on certain criteria. These criteria include authority, currency, accuracy, relevance, and objectivity. Thus, it is important to ensure that the source is written by a specialist in the area; the source is published within the past five years. Information presented in the article should be accurate, and the peer-review process is important for scholarly works. Content needs to be relevant and include only factual and credible data on the topic. Objectivity is important to be noted because a paper needs to be free of bias. These criteria work for website and academic articles, but in the field of scholarly writing, much attention is also paid to peer-reviewing. Furthermore, journal articles have a specific logical structure, and their quality is assessed according to the levels of evidence (Ingham-Broomfield, 2016). Thus, the results of randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews are prioritized when selecting evidence.
All the sources that were selected to provide evidence-based practice solutions to the problem of patients’ falls are of high quality and credible; they were published within the past five years. Thus, Tsuda (2017) provided a high-level systematic review on fall prevention interventions. The article by Wongrakpanich et al. (2019) presented the results of the quantitative practice improvement project oriented toward decreasing the risk of falling for patients with the help of the “stop-falling” checklist. Kinoshita et al. (2019) conducted a quantitative randomized controlled study to determine the role of the medical staff in preventing patients’ falls. All these high-quality articles include evidence-based information on the most effective practices for preventing falls in adult patients.
Quality Work
Unlimited Revisions
Affordable Pricing
24/7 Support
Fast Delivery