Inspecting the Ethical Conduct in the Three Cases: A Logical Law Ethicist’s Approach

Inspecting the Ethical Conduct in the Three Cases: A Logical Law Ethicist’s Approach

Concerning John Doe’s choice to clone himself, a logical law ethicist would likely differ with this course of action. Logic law ethics grasp that every human has intrinsic dignity and worth and that human life must be respected and secured from the start to the natural end. Cloning entails manipulating and utilizing the logical process of human reproduction, leading to a discount on the individualism and individuality of human beings (Hansen, 2018). Additionally, the development of a child solely to fulfill one’s own wish may be highlighted as a violation of the child’s intrinsic dignity and worth as a human being. In Jane Doe’s case, a logic law ethicist is likely to assert the intrinsic dignity and worth of every human being, despite their sexual orientation. Logic law ethics grasps that sexual expression must follow the logical approach of human sexuality, the expression of love and the propagation of new life within the context of marriage. This does not indicate that individuals who encounter same-sex attraction are genetically immoral to punishment. Concerning Joe and Mary’s wish to have another child through IVF, a logic law ethicist may have disquiet about the ways by which the child is being brought into existence. Logic law ethics grasp that human reproduction must be grounded in the analytical purpose of sexuality within marriage, where the dishonesty and exploitation of human life through technologies like IVF may violate human dignity and worth (Tham et al., 2022). A logic law ethicist may also acknowledge the profound server and longing that Joe and Mary are encountering, pursuing to provide support and guidance in their search for ethical and life-asserting ways of overcoming their infertility.

Conclusion

Ethics and religion are intimately connected, and they are not the same. Ethics is a system of principles guiding an individual’s behavior, while religion entails a set of beliefs and practices connected to the worship of a higher power. In John Doe’s case, cloning himself is an ethical quandary as it develops questions on the value of human life and the role of science in society. In Jane Doe’s case, being a lesbian is an ethical quandary as it stabilizes the subjective logic of ethical judgment, logical law ethics focuses on the intrinsic value of human life and the necessity of fulfilling an individual’s analytical purpose. Divine command ethics assert that the right course of action is to stick to God’s commands, even if they fight with individual wishes or societal norms. Comprehensively, navigating an ethical quandary needs proper consideration of all relevant factors involving an individual’s beliefs and obligations to others.