In a globe where individuals and organizations are always encountered with multiple moral quandaries, the essence of ethics has never been more fantastic. Ethics are the principles, values, and beliefs managing moral decision-making and behavior. Ethics is involved with right and wrong, virtue and unpleasant, fair and unfair, and it pursues to answer questions on how one behooves to live their lives and treat others. Numerous ethical theories and frameworks developed throughout history involve consequentialism, deontology, good ethics, and care ethics (Zoshak & Dew, 2021). Each perspective provides a distinct approach to determining what is ethical and moral, and each has its pluses and minuses, where ethics plays a critical role in numerous fields like medicine, law, politics, and business, and it is vital for individuals and organizations to have a clear comprehension of ethical principles and values to develop informed and accountable decisions. This essay will explore three distinct case studies, and eventually explain the connection between ethics and religion, the ethical path of conduct in each case determining, the type of paths of conduct that would be unethical, look at what emotivism say to appraise the ethical form of conduct, a natural law ethicist agreeing with the ethical form of conduct, and perspectives making use of divine command ethics.
The connection between ethics and religion is complex and persistent, with the most distinct approaches and viewpoints. In general, ethics are the principles and values guiding moral decision-making, while religion entails a set of beliefs, practices, and rituals connected to the worship of the higher power or divine being (Liyanapathirana & Akroyd, 2023). Most assert that ethics and religion are inherently related, with religious teachings acting as a basis for moral codes and ethical behavior. Others assert that ethical principles can be obtained from secular sources, stating that religious beliefs are inappropriate for ethical behavior. Arguments continue, with others saying that religion can sometimes be an obstacle to ethical behavior because an individual may use religious beliefs to explain harmful actions or victimize others who do not share their beliefs. Comprehensively, the connection between ethics and religion is a multiplex and refinement one, containing many distinct factors influencing the extent to which they are entwined.
The ethical track of conduct in the first case is to acknowledge that cloning a human being develops significant ethical issues required to be contemplated accurately. John Doe should contemplate the possible risk to the cloned child’s health and the psychological effect on the child of being developed solely for their genetic material, including the broader societal suggestions of cloning (Hamann-Rose, 2021). With the risk and unpredictability connected with cloning, John Doe must contemplate choices like adoption, surrogacy or sperm donation. Developing a child through cloning solely to meet his desire for a biological relationship is unethical if it harms the child. For the second case, the ethical truck of conduct is for Jane to be honest to herself, embracing her sexual orientation. Jane should live in a way that keeps her happy and fulfilled, discrimination and judgment-free. Admittedly, her parent’s religion must not hinder her from living her life. In case her parents reject her because she is a lesbian, this would be unethical for them to range their religious beliefs over the love they have for their daughter. It would be brutal and unfair to subject their child to emotional destruction and rejection due to their own beliefs. For the third case, the path of conduct is for Joe and Mary to contemplate the possible benefits and risks of IVF and range them against the principles of their religion. They may also desire to explore other choices, like adoption or fostering. Nevertheless, if they decide to seek IVF, it would be unethical for their religion to hinder them from acquiring this medical treatment, bringing them immense joy and healing (Okechukwu & Emeribe, 2021). Hindering them from acquiring medical treatment and assisting them in having another child would be brutal and unfair, specifically provided the emotional pain and loss already suffered. It would be a contravention of their sovereignty and an obstacle to their ability to develop decisions in their own lives.
Quality Work
Unlimited Revisions
Affordable Pricing
24/7 Support
Fast Delivery