Interpersonal Communication as an Important Skill in the Army: Essay

Interpersonal Communication as an Important Skill in the Army: Essay

Skills such as interpersonal communication in the military are extremely important as it directly correlates with leadership competency. Interpersonal communication is the process of exchange of information, ideas, and feelings between two or more people through verbal or non-verbal methods. Successfully interacting with others is determined by knowing what others identify. It depends on accepting the personality, responses, and causes of yourself and others. When using interpersonal communication in the military it is important to recognize diversity, use self-control, balance, and stability in situations.

Recognizing diversity between others inside a group allows leaders to better understand how soldiers' social impacts and backgrounds helped to form them as individuals. ADRP 6-22 states: “Background, schooling, race, religion, and other factors shape soldiers and army civilians. Personal perspectives vary within societal groups. By acknowledging differences, qualifications, contributions, and potential, army leaders further strengthen the team effort by creating an environment where subordinates know they are valued for their talents, contributions, and differences. A leader’s job is to employ the different capabilities and talents brought to the team to build the best possible team”. Every soldier is likely to offer a distinctive outlook which can be a big help in order to effectively get ready for and accomplish a mission. Ponder is a unit that has an infantryman initially from China who speaks Chinese fluently. While conducting a calculated questioning situation in which a very important person is speaking Chinese, this soldier now becomes one of the main factors in accomplishing the mission. As a leader being able to recognize this soldier's diversity has now helped the team.

Save your time!
We can take care of your essay

• Proper editing and formatting
• Free revision, title page, and bibliography
• Flexible prices and money-back guarantee

PLACE ORDER

Active leaders that are effective have control over their emotions. Leaders should show the correct volume of passion and sensitivity to get into a soldier's feelings, as a replacement for a lack of emotion. Upholding self-control encourages composed assurance in the team. Self-control inspires criticism from the team that can increase understanding of any situation, good or bad. Self-control in combat is important for army leaders because losing control can mean losing one’s life. Leaders who lose their control cannot expect his or her followers to sustain theirs. Throughout our military, we have all been witness to countless examples of poor leadership where the leader has been deficient in self-control. Unfitting attitudes from leadership produce an environment of doubt and, in the long run, one of discord. According to ADRP 6-22, “Self-control, balance, and stability enable making ethical choices. An ethical leader successfully applies ethical principles to decision-making. It is critical for leaders to remain calm under pressure and expend energy on things they can positively influence and not worry about things they cannot”.

Leaders who have their emotions balanced are able to display the correct emotion for the situation at hand and can tell someone’s emotional state by reading them. They know how to decide what is suitable for situations. Well-balanced leaders know how to express resolution without throwing the whole group into a riot. The balanced leader is aware. Inner reflection was known as selfish. But the best leaders are self-knowing, and notice when their feelings are getting the best of them. Actual leaders are steady, calm when under pressure and exhausted, and calm in the face of risk.

An army leader’s self-control, balance, and stability greatly affect their ability to interact with others. People have hopes, fears, concerns, and dreams. Understanding that emotional energy sparks motivation and endurance is a powerful leadership tool. Giving constructive feedback helps mobilize the team’s emotional energies to accomplish difficult missions. The ability to communicate effectively to attain common understanding and eventually the wanted end state needs not only clear and brief leadership but also an empathetic and gratitude for the fact that subordinates must be given the elasticity and leeway which will enable them to use controlled ingenuity within that leadership and intent to perform and accomplish the mission. Accepting how soldiers obtain and observe that instruction is principal to interpersonal communication. In fact, maintaining effective in