The concept of health is a dynamic process, depicting an individual’s ability to adapt to changing internal and external environments in order to maintain overall well-being. Successful adaptation, even in the face of stress or chronic illness, leads to a state of wellness, considered a higher level on the health-illness continuum. This continuum serves as a graphical representation of individual wellness, evaluating emotional, social, and psychological well-being. It acknowledges the fluctuating nature of well-being, recognizing that individuals undergo various stages of health and illness throughout their lives (Lundqvist & Andersson, 2021).
The health-illness continuum positions optimum health and wellness to the right and illness and premature death to the left. Individuals slide along this scale throughout life, aspiring to move towards the positive end of the spectrum. This paper delves into perspectives on the health-illness continuum and its significance in patient care.
According to the National Wellness Institute, the health-illness continuum comprises six elements: physical, social, emotional, intellectual, spiritual, and occupational wellness (Lundqvist & Andersson, 2021). Physical wellness pertains to self-care through exercise, sleep, and diet, while social wellness involves interactions and contributions to communities. Emotional wellness encompasses awareness, acceptance, and coping with emotions, while intellectual wellness focuses on engaging in activities that stimulate the brain. Occupational wellness is achieved through fulfilling work aligning with personal values, and spiritual wellness involves finding meaning in life based on beliefs and values (Gazaway et al., 2019).
When caring for a patient, a comprehensive examination of these elements is crucial, as well-being extends beyond the absence of disease or injuries. Assessing these facets acknowledges their impact on the recovery process. The health-illness continuum promotes a holistic approach to treatment, shifting from intermittent goals focusing solely on physical symptoms to broader, lasting goals that enhance overall life quality. This perspective addresses gaps in a patient’s treatment plan by connecting key elements and emphasizes conscious awareness of individual health (Swan et al., 2019).
For healthcare providers, the health-illness continuum offers an opportunity to address issues beyond direct treatment, reassures patients about the decisions they make for their well-being, and acknowledges emotional and spiritual aspects. This is particularly essential when dealing with chronic illnesses where medical interventions may be limited. For instance, a cancer patient may need emotional and spiritual support alongside medical interventions to improve overall well-being (Gazaway et al., 2019).
In alignment with Christian teachings, the health-illness continuum upholds human dignity by treating the patient rather than the disease, involving the patient in the wellness process. Patients are empowered to play a valuable role in enhancing their well-being, living according to their principles and values.
On a personal note, I find myself below the average mark on the health-illness continuum. During stressful moments, my habits such as opting for fast food and disrupted sleeping patterns contribute to a lower level of well-being. To move towards a higher level on the health-illness spectrum, I plan to seek the assistance of the school counselor to develop healthier stress management strategies. Additionally, engaging with a life coach will enhance self-awareness and help me utilize my resources more effectively in the pursuit of self-actualization.
References
Gazaway, S., Stewart, M., & Schumacher, A. (2019). Integrating palliative care into the chronic illness continuum: a conceptual model for minority populations. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 6, 1078-1086.
Lundqvist, C., & Andersson, G. (2021). Let’s talk about mental health and mental disorders in elite sports: a narrative review of theoretical perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 700829.
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation Science, 7(2), 97.
Swanson, C., Thompson, A., Valentz, R., Doerner, L., & Jezek, K. (2019). Theory of Nursing for the Whole Person: A distinctly scriptural framework. Journal of Christian Nursing, 36(4), 222-227.
Quality Work
Unlimited Revisions
Affordable Pricing
24/7 Support
Fast Delivery