NURS 6052 EBP Week 3 Assignment NURS 6052 EBP Week 3 Assignment

NURS 6052 EBP Week 3 Assignment NURS 6052 EBP Week 3 Assignment

Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry Create a 4- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. Describe how you used keywords to search on your chosen clinical issue of interest. Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected. Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. Part 2: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following: The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format. A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article. A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.NURS 6052 EBP Week 3 Assignment

ORDER A PLAGIARISM -FREE PAPER NOW

Fernando, S. A., Gray, T. J., & Gottlieb, T. (2017). Healthcare‐acquired infections: prevention strategies. Internal medicine journal, 47(12), 1341-1351. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/imj.13642

This article was chosen because it provides a research on healthcare‐acquired infections and the strategies of prevention. It relates to the clinical issue of interest in that it offers literature material and evidence essential in answering the PICOT question. The study respects ethics of research in that it respects the confidentiality of the participants and acknowledges secondary sources of evidence.

The research methodology used in the article is a qualitative method of research. The methodology employs the grounded theory to conduct the study. It presents data in a non-numerical form and uses inductive reasoning to analyze data on the prevention strategies for HAIs.NURS 6052 EBP Week 3 Assignment

The strengths of this methodology is that it allows a thick description of knowledge that identifies the contradiction and conflicting areas. The research methodology allows replicability of results and processes and hence can be considered reliable and valid.it is also consistent and can be considered trustworthy.

Haverstick, S., Goodrich, C., Freeman, R., James, S., Kullar, R., & Ahrens, M. (2017). Patients’ handwashing and reducing hospital-acquired infection. Critical care nurse, 37(3), e1-e8. retrieved from https://aacnjournals.org/ccnonline/article/37/3/e1/3575/Patients-Hand-Washing-and-Reducing-Hospital

This article was chosen to inform the topic of interest and answer the research question. This is because, it indicates how handwashing by patients can prevent hospital acquired infections. This relates to the clinical issue of interest in that it examines the exact problem and interventions suggested by the PICOT question. The ethics of research include maintenance of the participating patient’s dignity, confidentiality and allowing them a written informed consent,.

The research aimed at promoting the utilization of hand washing with soap and water, hand sanitizer, or both and improve patients’ education to reduce hospital-acquired infections

The research methodology used was quantitative. It employed the use of data in numerical form.

The strengths of methodology is that it allows reliability and validity. Its findings can be replicated over time to produce similar results.

O’Donoghue, M., Ng, S. H., Suen, L. K., &