NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2: Publication or Source Reputation

NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2: Publication or Source Reputation

:

Another criterion of credibility is the standing of the media or source, which also constitutes a criterion. Reputable and peer-reviewed scientific journals with a high impact factor rate are normally considered good sources of information. Just like in the case of websites, highly technical organizations, and higher educational institutions that are credible are usually more trusted than individual blogs and commercial websites (Kimmons, 2020). Evaluation of the reputation of the publication or source includes finding its history, the theme, and previous products like journals or contents it had. One can analyze the resource (a particular journal or website publisher, for instance) using such criteria to review its reputation and compare it to the already established standards of credibility and reliability (Suiter & Sarli, 2019).

Importance of Incorporating Credible Evidence into Evidence-Based Practice

In most cases, EBP works effectively across quality, safety, diagnosis, and management of healthcare conditions. EBP is the best practice when addressing quality or safety issues and diagnosing and managing healthcare conditions (Stannard, 2021). The presence of credible evidence in EBP is important. Through such reutilizing diplomacy proofs, diplomatic providers can improve patients’ health conditions, increase utilization, and reduce the potential risks of suboptimal care practices (Jasna Karačić Zanetti et al., 2023). In terms of sound evidence authority, the practice enhancement approach is built on solid evidence as it helps guide health workers into applying knowledge tested through scientific practices.

Example of Improvement in CKD Diagnosis and Management

For example, suppose we work with an evidence-based practice model like the Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) model. In that case, we can develop and implement processes that can help diagnose and manage Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Not only do we blend authentic proofs in every phase of the KTA Modal, but healthcare providers also get the upper hand in affecting the effectiveness and efficiency of CKD care delivery (Tariq et al., 2022). In the second stage of the KTA Model, i.e., “Knowledge Creation,” healthcare providers look for credible sources of evidence, such as peer-reviewed journals and clinical guidelines, that will enable them to obtain a profound understanding of CKD pathophysiology, risk factors, and diagnostic criteria (Muscedere et al., 2023). It forms the basis for consolidating conceptual thinking and directing clinical care and professional practices by the best guidelines.

During this “Action Cycle” stage, healthcare providers are implementers. They turn evidence-based evidence-based knowledge into practice by designing and developing interventions and protocols customized for CKD diagnosis and treatment. As an example, evidence-based guidelines from respected sources like The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) may propose checking the kidney function regularly using laboratory tests and microscopic analysis of urine together with lifestyle adjustments as well as treatments with medications that slow the spread of disease and manage complications (Lentine et al., 2021). The KTA model, by equipping healthcare providers with evidence-based recommendations, allows them to maximize the diagnosis and management of CKD thus, quality care and minimal healthcare costs can be achieved together because of improved outcomes.

Conclusion

As regards to the management of Chronic Kidney diseases, it is pertinent that credible evidence be made use of for the improvement of the patients and the cutting of health care costs. By implementing programs and interventions indicative of the best clinical practice, physicians can enhance the quality of treatment by reducing differences in practicing. Exploitation of the models such as the KTA model (Knowledge to Action) grants healthcare specialists the opportunity to apply evidence-based strategies to clinical practice and, eventually, leads to positive outcomes and healthier patients in the face of this complex (complicated) condition.

References

Fang, J.-T., Chen, S.-Y., Tian, Y.-C., Lee, C.-H., Wu, I-Wen., Kao, C.-Y., Lin, C.-C., & Tang, W.-R. (2022). Effectiveness of end-stage renal disease communication skills training for healthcare personnel: A single-center, single-blind, randomized study. BMC, 22(1).