Professional Application: One or more professional applications of the presented theories/concepts.

Professional Application: One or more professional applications of the presented theories/concepts.

Professionally, the concept of mental health illiteracy and stigma can be applied to assess the mental health literacy of patients within the healthcare setting.
Understanding a patient’s level of literacy can improve the quality of care through early detection of symptoms, provision of culturally appropriate education, and encouragement of participation in mental health treatment.
Statistical Analysis Matrix
Add additional rows if needed
Research Strengths Research Weaknesses Research Relevance to Topic of Interest

Notes

The study utilized a sufficient sample size and can therefore be generalized to Hispanic women.
The absence of a control group in the study raises the possibility of selection bias.
The study is pertinent to my area of interest because it investigates the role of patient education level as a predictor of mental health literacy.
Utilizing a control group would have diminished the likelihood of bias.
The researchers utilized a universal screening instrument, PHQ-9, to screen participants for depression.
Participants in the study were exclusively Hispanic women, limiting its applicability to individuals of other ethnicities.
The study found that the greater a participant’s knowledge of depression and its symptoms, the less likely they were to experience stigma when seeking mental health care.
Mental health literacy can reduce the negative effects of stigma on care-seeking.
The study also employed a number of validated instruments to assess depression stigma, such as the Stigma Concerns About Mental Health Care Measure (SCMHC), the Social Distance Measure (Social Distance), and the Latino Scale for Antidepressant Stigma Measure.
The majority of the participants in the study spoke Spanish. Therefore, the study did not investigate differences in mental health literacy and stigma between Spanish- and English-speaking participants. The more a person knows about depression, the more likely they are to interact with a depressed individual who has received treatment. Education level influences mental health literacy. A higher level of education increases mental health literacy. Participants were screened for depression using self-reports, which introduces the possibility of reporting bias. The results of the study supported the hypothesis that disease knowledge is a crucial component of treatment adherence. It is possible to improve mental health literacy by assessing education level and providing culturally sensitive care. The study demonstrates that an early assessment of a patient’s educational level at the point of care can be advantageous because it provides insight into intervention options and reduces barriers associated with mental health treatment.

Since it meets the CARP criteria, I would recommend the article by Lopez et al. (2018) to inform professional practice. Since the article was published three years ago, it is current. There are also functional links. As university professors who instruct mental health and social work, the authors are qualified to write about mental health illiteracy and stigma. In addition, the article was published by BMC Public Health, a journal that focuses on the social determinants of health, the behavioral, environmental, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the community-level effects of health practices, interventions, and policies. In addition, the article is pertinent because it evaluates the role of patient education level as a predictor of mental health literacy. The target audience for this article is mental health care professionals. Therefore, I would recommend it for professional use. In addition, the authors provide references and sources for the information used, lending credibility to the work. The authors provide factual information with the intent of informing mental health providers on how to reduce stigma associated with mental illness. The authors’ lack of bias makes the article suitable for use as a professional guide.

Step 2: Analysis Summary

Below is a two- to three-paragraph summary that includes the following:
• Describe your methodology for identifying and analyzing research that has been peer-reviewed.
• Specify at least two effective strategies for locating peer-reviewed research that you would employ.
• Identify at least one future peer-reviewed research resource you intend to use.

Methodology for Locating and Analyzing Peer-Review

Order A Similar Paper