The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficience Instructions: new technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. the stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficience Instructions: new technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. the stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. responds fully to questions posed by faculty. provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. response is effectively written in standard, edited english. points range: 14 (14%) - 15 (15%) response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. response is effectively written in standard, edited english. points range: 12 (12%) - 13 (13%) response is on topic and may have some depth. responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. points range: 0 (0%) - 11 (11%) response may not be on topic and lacks depth. responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. responses to faculty questions are missing. no credible sources are cited. participation points range: 5 (5%) - 5 (5%) meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. points range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) points range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) points range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%) does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Also Read: Nursing Dissertation Writing Service

Required: required readings mcgonigle, d., & mastrian, k. g. (2017). nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). burlington, ma: jones & bartlett learning. chapter 14, “the electronic health record and clinical informatics” (pp. 267–287) chapter 15, “informatics tools to promote patient safety and quality outcomes” (pp. 293–317) chapter 16, “patient engagement and connected health” (pp. 323–338) chapter 17, “using informatics to promote community/population health” (pp. 341–355) chapter 18, “telenursing and remote access telehealth” (pp. 359–388) dykes, p. c., rozenblum, r., dalal, a., massaro, a., chang, f., clements, m., collins, s. …bates, d. w. (2017). prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: the promoting respect and ongoing safety through patient engagement communication and technology study. critical care medicine, 45(8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/ccm.[removed]9 healthit.gov. (2018c). what is an electronic health record (ehr)? retrieved from https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr rao-gupta, s., kruger, d. leak, l. d., tieman, l. a., & manworren, r. c. b. (2018). leveraging interactive patient care technology to improve pain management engagement. pain management nursing, 19(3), 212–221. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2017.11.002 note: you will access this article from the walden library databases. skiba, d. (2017). evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applications. informatics, 4(3), 32–40. doi:10.3390/informatics[removed] note: you will access this article from the walden library